Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Anastasiia Gureva vs Lisa Claeys Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gureva vs Claeys analysis and find out who is favored!
Anastasiia Gureva vs Lisa Claeys Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gureva 0 - 0 Claeys
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gureva has won 43.21% of points on their second serve, while Claeys has won 38.17%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gureva, in recent form, has won 54.39% of their opponent's second serve points, while Claeys has won 60.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.18% and 46.55% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gureva has saved 52.66% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Claeys has saved 49.18% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gureva has won 60.38% of matches played (W/L 32/ 21), with Claeys winning 53.33% (W/L 8/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gureva has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 71% (W/L 5/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 18/ 15). Claeys has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 11/ 11), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 36% (W/L 4/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Gureva has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 21/ 18), where as Claeys has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 8/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gureva has played against opponents with an average rank of 279.21 while Claeys has played against players with an average rank of 152.73.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gureva has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Claeys has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gureva has converted 40.59% of breakpoint opportunities, and Claeys has converted 51.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
373
Rank
370
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
66% (76-39)
Career Total W/L
45% (15-18)
50% (11-11)
YTD W/L
64% (7-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Anastasiia Gureva | Lisa Claeys |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (11/11) | 64% (7/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 47% (24/27) | 58% (14/10) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (233/251) | 56% (127/98) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 64% (7/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 67 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.44 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 105 | 30 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:59 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 263.64 | 138.55 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1005/1534) | 64% (236/367) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (634/1005) | 52% (123/236) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (229/530) | 38% (50/131) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (69/170) | 52% (31/60) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (658/1541) | 52% (199/383) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (8/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (3/1) | 64% (7/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (10/21) | 64% (7/11) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 63% (5/8) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (12/10) | 100% (6/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (12/2) | 0% (6/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 20% (5/1) |
Anastasiia Gureva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Anastasiia Gureva
69%
(
81 of
118)
1st Serve %
69%
(
96 of
139)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
9
74%
(
60 of
81)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
62 of
96)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
40 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
55 of
139)
133
Total Points Won
124
|
7-5 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Angela Fita Boluda
Player
Anastasiia Gureva
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Duru Soke
Player
Anastasiia Gureva
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
77
Total Points Won
54
|
3-6 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasiia Gureva
Player
Zhanel Rustemova
56%
(
50 of
90)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
4
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
11
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
43 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasiia Gureva
Player
Eva Zabolotnaia
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
49%
(
36 of
74)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
7
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 3-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Anastasiia Gureva
Player
Lea Aschenberger
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xinxin Yao
Player
Anastasiia Gureva
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Anastasiia Gureva
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Anastasiia Gureva
58%
(
50 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
7
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasiia Gureva
Player
Meng Yi Chen
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
75%
(
70 of
93)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Lisa Claeys Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Dia Evtimova
Player
Lisa Claeys
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Claeys
Player
Caroline Romeo
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
53%
(
32 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
47 of
81)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lisa Claeys
Player
Bela Tamhankar
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
71%
(
29 of
41)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Dana Baidaulet
Player
Lisa Claeys
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
53%
(
17 of
32)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
30%
(
9 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
58%
(
36 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
46 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Barbara Dessolis
Player
Lisa Claeys
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
43%
(
22 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lisa Claeys
Player
Elena Grekul
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
4
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
49%
(
40 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 7-5 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 3-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Gureva Vs Claeys Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gureva are available here and Claeys photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
